Yogita Bharat Kamble vs Bharat Madhukar Kamble Advocate - S. S. Sapate — 16/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO160007802023
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
554/2023
Filing Date
23-08-2023
Registration No
16/2023
Registration Date
02-09-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogita Bharat Kamble
Adv. S. A. SURYAGANDH
Respondent(s)
Bharat Madhukar Kamble Advocate - S. S. Sapate
Madhukar Narayan Kamble
Tarabai Madhukar Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Yogita Bharat Kamble v. Bharat Madhukar Kamble (Case 16/2023) Yogita Bharat Kamble filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking interim maintenance and relief. She alleged physical and mental abuse, insulting behavior, and wrongful expulsion from her matrimonial home by her husband Bharat Madhukar Kamble and his family members. The husband denied all allegations and filed a counter-petition claiming the wife's erratic behavior. The court partially allowed the petition, ordering the husband to pay Rs. 3,000 per month interim maintenance to the wife from the date of petition filing (23/08/2023) until final judgment in the main case. The court found domestic violence established and recognized the husband's financial capacity, while rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Yogita Bharat Kamble v. Bharat Madhukar Kamble (Case 16/2023) Yogita Bharat Kamble filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking interim maintenance and relief. She alleged physical and mental abuse, insulting behavior, and wrongful expulsion from her matrimonial home by her husband Bharat Madhukar Kamble and his family members. The husband denied all allegations and filed a counter-petition claiming the wife's erratic behavior. The court partially allowed the petition, ordering the husband to pay Rs. 3,000 per month interim maintenance to the wife from the date of petition filing (23/08/2023) until final judgment in the main case. The court found domestic violence established and recognized the husband's financial capacity, while rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts