State of Maharashtra vs Nisarmahamad Hidar Mahaldar — 379/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO160007592025
Filing Number
558/2025
Filing Date
30-Sep-2025
Registration No
379/2025
Registration Date
01-Oct-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nisarmahamad Hidar Mahaldar
-
2.Ganesh Sadashiv Shinde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. and discharged both accused (Nisarmahamad Hidar Mahaldar and Ganesh Sadashiv Shinde) after the prosecution failed to secure their presence despite sufficient opportunity. Seizeed property—Rs. 3,200 cash—was forfeited to the State, while worthless items (slip book and ball pen) were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
20-Apr-2026
Filing Of V.P.
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
16-Mar-2026
Filing Of V.P.
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
16-Feb-2026
B.W._Unready
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
08-Jan-2026
B.W._Unready
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
20-Nov-2025
B.W._Unready
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
04-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 379/2025
The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. and discharged both accused (Nisarmahamad Hidar Mahaldar and Ganesh Sadashiv Shinde) after the prosecution failed to secure their presence despite sufficient opportunity. Seizeed property—Rs. 3,200 cash—was forfeited to the State, while worthless items (slip book and ball pen) were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts