JAYSHRI JAYWANT KATKAR vs TANAJI DAGADU MARATHE — 145/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Aug-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO160007402025

e-Filing Number

15-09-2025

Filing Number

200/2025

Filing Date

17-Sep-2025

Registration No

145/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi

Judge

3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYSHRI JAYWANT KATKAR

    Adv. Riyaz Patavegar

  2. 2.VAISHALI JAYWANT KATKAR AFTER MARRIAGE VAISHALI SUNIL PATIL

    Adv. PATAVEGAR RIYAZ AZAD

  3. 3.JAYRAJ JAYWANT KATKAR

    Adv. PATAVEGAR RIYAZ AZAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TANAJI DAGADU MARATHE

Case History

  1. 17-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on T.I.

    Case Summary: 145/2025 Outcome: The petition for interim relief (temporary injunction) filed by the petitioners was dismissed/rejected. Key Issue: The petitioners sought urgent orders to prevent the respondent from interfering with their peaceful possession of disputed agricultural property in Yelaur, Shahuwadi, Kolhapur. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate irreparable harm warranting interim relief at this stage, particularly given that a related land acquisition compensation dispute is already pending before the District Court involving the same parties and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  14. 13-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  15. 09-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  16. 09-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  18. 21-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  20. 17-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  21. 07-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  22. 04-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  23. 03-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  24. 20-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 17-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 145/2025 Outcome: The petition for interim relief (temporary injunction) filed by the petitioners was dismissed/rejected. Key Issue: The petitioners sought urgent orders to prevent the respondent from interfering with their peaceful possession of disputed agricultural property in Yelaur, Shahuwadi, Kolhapur. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate irreparable harm warranting interim relief at this stage, particularly given that a related land acquisition compensation dispute is already pending before the District Court involving the same parties and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case