Atamaram Lakhu Khot(Legal Heir) vs Tukaram Lakhu Khot etc.26 Advocate - R. V. Nagvekar — 112/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO160005712018
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
156/2018
Filing Date
23-10-2018
Registration No
112/2018
Registration Date
23-10-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Atamaram Lakhu Khot(Legal Heir)
Adv. S. K. Salokhe
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Lakhu Khot etc.26 Advocate - R. V. Nagvekar
Shivaji Lakhu Khot
Dagadu Hari Patil
Tarubai Ananda Khot
Nityanand Ananda Khot
Bhagoji Vitthal Shingade
Dagadu Joti Khot(Legal Heir)
Shevantabai Shripati Khot
Chandrakant Shripati Khot
Susabai Ramchandra Gharankar
Yesabai Baban Dhanawade
Nakubai Rangrao Bharankar
Sakubai Keshav Ravande(Legal Heir)
Janabai Dagadu Bhosale
Dyandev Shankar Khot
Rakubai Baban Lavate
Pandu Tuka Khot(Legal Heir)
Malubai Pandurang Khot
Bajirao Pandurang Khot
Sunita Tanaji Patil
Surekha Ashok Agalave
Bandu Dhondiba Khot
Ananda Dhondiba Khot
Ajit Tanaji Gavade
Pandurang Mahadev Lavate
Shivshakti Sidhapith, Sayahadri Pahad Trust Through ParamHans Swami Ganeshanand
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
Evidence
Evidence
Steps
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 20-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case 112/2018 Summary: The plaintiff's application to set aside a "no evidence" order was allowed. The court found the plaintiff's delay in filing evidence was unintentional and that the suit should be decided on merit. The no evidence order passed on 15/09/2025 was set aside, subject to the plaintiff paying Rs. 100 cost to the defendant. The plaintiff may now lead evidence after payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 112/2018 Summary: The plaintiff's application to set aside a "no evidence" order was allowed. The court found the plaintiff's delay in filing evidence was unintentional and that the suit should be decided on merit. The no evidence order passed on 15/09/2025 was set aside, subject to the plaintiff paying Rs. 100 cost to the defendant. The plaintiff may now lead evidence after payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts