Manohar Ramchandra Kamble vs Aavadiram Ranoji Whavale Advocate - S. A. Lad — 66/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO160004702020
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
109/2020
Filing Date
10-11-2020
Registration No
66/2020
Registration Date
10-11-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar Ramchandra Kamble
Adv. Adv. V. S. Rajpal
Respondent(s)
Aavadiram Ranoji Whavale Advocate - S. A. Lad
Subhash Dharma Kamble
Chandrakant Dharma Kamble
Ananda Dharma Kamble
Bhikaji Dhondiram Kamble
Kondiba Dhondiram Kamble
Tukaram Koyanya Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-01-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 13-10-2025 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 66/2020 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal (Petition No. 21) challenging the respondents' occupation of disputed properties. The court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Records Officer to measure and demarcate four specific land parcels (A, B, C, D) and determine the respondents' boundaries. The court ordered the Commissioner to investigate whether respondents unlawfully encroached and obstructed the petitioner's rights, and to submit detailed reports. The court also directed parties to file objections and fixed proceedings to determine the main dispute regarding property ownership and any wrongful trespassing by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 66/2020 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal (Petition No. 21) challenging the respondents' occupation of disputed properties. The court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Records Officer to measure and demarcate four specific land parcels (A, B, C, D) and determine the respondents' boundaries. The court ordered the Commissioner to investigate whether respondents unlawfully encroached and obstructed the petitioner's rights, and to submit detailed reports. The court also directed parties to file objections and fixed proceedings to determine the main dispute regarding property ownership and any wrongful trespassing by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts