Vandana Jaisingh Patil vs Jaisingh Keshav Patil Advocate - Shankarrao D. Patil — 8/2026
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO160001772026
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
122/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
FIR Details
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vandana Jaisingh Patil
Adv. R. B. Gavade
Respondent(s)
Jaisingh Keshav Patil Advocate - Shankarrao D. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Steps
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Steps |
| 30-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 8/2026 Petitioner: Vandana Jaisingh Patil Respondent: Jaisingh Keshav Patil (Advocate Shankarrao D. Patil) Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, MalkaPur-Shahuwadi, Kolhapur Outcome: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and granted interim maintenance of ₹3,000 monthly for the petitioner's subsistence from the date of filing (13.03.2026) until final judgment. A protective order restraining the respondent from committing physical and mental abuse was issued. The respondent was also prohibited from transferring the petitioner's share in joint property without her prior written consent. The petition regarding post-retirement government benefits was rejected as premature, lacking sufficient evidence of the respondent's intention to misappropriate such future benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 8/2026 Petitioner: Vandana Jaisingh Patil Respondent: Jaisingh Keshav Patil (Advocate Shankarrao D. Patil) Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, MalkaPur-Shahuwadi, Kolhapur Outcome: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and granted interim maintenance of ₹3,000 monthly for the petitioner's subsistence from the date of filing (13.03.2026) until final judgment. A protective order restraining the respondent from committing physical and mental abuse was issued. The respondent was also prohibited from transferring the petitioner's share in joint property without her prior written consent. The petition regarding post-retirement government benefits was rejected as premature, lacking sufficient evidence of the respondent's intention to misappropriate such future benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts