Vandana Jaisingh Patil vs Jaisingh Keshav Patil Advocate - Shankarrao D. Patil — 8/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Steps Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHKO160001772026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

122/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Shahuwadi Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vandana Jaisingh Patil

    Adv. R. B. Gavade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaisingh Keshav Patil Advocate - Shankarrao D. Patil

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 8/2026 Petitioner: Vandana Jaisingh Patil Respondent: Jaisingh Keshav Patil (Advocate Shankarrao D. Patil) Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, MalkaPur-Shahuwadi, Kolhapur Outcome: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and granted interim maintenance of ₹3,000 monthly for the petitioner's subsistence from the date of filing (13.03.2026) until final judgment. A protective order restraining the respondent from committing physical and mental abuse was issued. The respondent was also prohibited from transferring the petitioner's share in joint property without her prior written consent. The petition regarding post-retirement government benefits was rejected as premature, lacking sufficient evidence of the respondent's intention to misappropriate such future benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  4. 30-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  5. 28-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  6. 25-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  7. 19-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  8. 12-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  9. 05-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  10. 04-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  11. 20-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  12. 13-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  13. 30-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  14. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 8/2026 Petitioner: Vandana Jaisingh Patil Respondent: Jaisingh Keshav Patil (Advocate Shankarrao D. Patil) Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, MalkaPur-Shahuwadi, Kolhapur Outcome: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and granted interim maintenance of ₹3,000 monthly for the petitioner's subsistence from the date of filing (13.03.2026) until final judgment. A protective order restraining the respondent from committing physical and mental abuse was issued. The respondent was also prohibited from transferring the petitioner's share in joint property without her prior written consent. The petition regarding post-retirement government benefits was rejected as premature, lacking sufficient evidence of the respondent's intention to misappropriate such future benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case