State of Maharashtra vs Lomeshkumar Sitaram Shahu — 79/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO160001752026

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi

Judge

3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

Shahuwadi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lomeshkumar Sitaram Shahu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Lomeshkumar Sitaram Shahu (79/2026) The National Lok-Adalat court convicted Lomeshkumar Sitaram Shahu under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent act endangering life) for recklessly operating his motorcycle at high speed on March 11, 2026, disregarding traffic conditions and endangering public safety. The accused pleaded guilty and cited his poor financial circumstances and family dependence. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 and two days simple imprisonment, considering his first offense, financial hardship, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Lomeshkumar Sitaram Shahu (79/2026) The National Lok-Adalat court convicted Lomeshkumar Sitaram Shahu under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent act endangering life) for recklessly operating his motorcycle at high speed on March 11, 2026, disregarding traffic conditions and endangering public safety. The accused pleaded guilty and cited his poor financial circumstances and family dependence. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 and two days simple imprisonment, considering his first offense, financial hardship, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case