State of Maharashtra vs Liyakat Ahmad Mullani — 78/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO160001742026
Filing Number
119/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Liyakat Ahmad Mullani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 78/2026 Summary: Liyakat Ahmad Mullani was convicted under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Rules, 2023, for illegally manufacturing and selling flavored tobacco products without proper labeling or safety warnings. The National Lok Adalat court found him guilty after he admitted to the charges, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 and five days simple imprisonment, considering his first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 78/2026
Case 78/2026 Summary: Liyakat Ahmad Mullani was convicted under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Rules, 2023, for illegally manufacturing and selling flavored tobacco products without proper labeling or safety warnings. The National Lok Adalat court found him guilty after he admitted to the charges, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 and five days simple imprisonment, considering his first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts