State of Maharashtra vs Sahil Uraf Hasan Yakub Mulla — 77/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO160001732026
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
77/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sahil Uraf Hasan Yakub Mulla
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 77/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalat court convicted Sahil Uraf Hasan Yakub Mulla under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Rules, 2023, for illegally manufacturing and selling unregulated tobacco products without proper labeling or statutory warnings on March 3, 2026. The defendant pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 and 5 days simple imprisonment, considering his first-time offense, poor financial circumstances, and dependent family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2026
Case 77/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalat court convicted Sahil Uraf Hasan Yakub Mulla under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Rules, 2023, for illegally manufacturing and selling unregulated tobacco products without proper labeling or statutory warnings on March 3, 2026. The defendant pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 and 5 days simple imprisonment, considering his first-time offense, poor financial circumstances, and dependent family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts