State of Maharashtra vs Mustafa Mirasahab Attar — 72/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO160001682026

Filing Number

113/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

72/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

Shahuwadi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mustafa Mirasahab Attar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mustafa Mirasahab Attar (Case 72/2026) The National Lok-Adalat court convicted Mustafa Mirasahab Attar under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 for rash and negligent driving of a Mahindra Jito vehicle on January 2, 2026, endangering public safety. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹2,000 and undergo five days simple imprisonment, considering his first-time offense, poor financial circumstances, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mustafa Mirasahab Attar (Case 72/2026) The National Lok-Adalat court convicted Mustafa Mirasahab Attar under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 for rash and negligent driving of a Mahindra Jito vehicle on January 2, 2026, endangering public safety. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹2,000 and undergo five days simple imprisonment, considering his first-time offense, poor financial circumstances, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case