Sandip Prakash Patil vs State of Maharashtra — 4/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 27th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO160001562026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
106/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
FIR Details
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandip Prakash Patil
Adv. V. B. Singhan
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Disposed
Arguments
Reply/Say
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.M.A.No.04/2026 Decision: The court allowed Sandip Prakash Patil's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 to recover his seized Maruti Suzuki Dzire vehicle. The court rejected the police's arguments that the vehicle might be misused, altered, or was necessary for trial, finding that safe custody and production before court when required were sufficient safeguards. Conditions: The vehicle was released upon furnishing a ₹7,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle as required, cannot transfer or alter it without court permission, cannot use it illegally, must cooperate in investigation, and must bear photography expenses for documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.M.A.No.04/2026 Decision: The court allowed Sandip Prakash Patil's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 to recover his seized Maruti Suzuki Dzire vehicle. The court rejected the police's arguments that the vehicle might be misused, altered, or was necessary for trial, finding that safe custody and production before court when required were sufficient safeguards. Conditions: The vehicle was released upon furnishing a ₹7,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle as required, cannot transfer or alter it without court permission, cannot use it illegally, must cooperate in investigation, and must bear photography expenses for documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts