Krishna Akaram Patil vs Avinash Kashiling Vagre Advocate - V. V. Bambawadekar — 32/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO160000972026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Krishna Akaram Patil

Adv. satvshil D lad

Dagdu Balku Patil

Adv. satvshil D lad

Shivaji Vitthal Patil

Adv. satvshil D lad

Sangita Baburao Patil

Adv. satvshil D lad

Respondent(s)

Avinash Kashiling Vagre Advocate - V. V. Bambawadekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

06-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

04-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-04-2026

W.S. and Say

16-03-2026

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

06-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 32/2026 Summary The court allowed defendant No. 1's application for condonation of delay in filing a written statement (W.S.), despite finding the 40-day delay was not satisfactorily explained. The court set aside the "no W.S." order and condoned the delay, prioritizing natural justice and the defendant's right to defend the case. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiffs by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 32/2026 Summary The court allowed defendant No. 1's application for condonation of delay in filing a written statement (W.S.), despite finding the 40-day delay was not satisfactorily explained. The court set aside the "no W.S." order and condoned the delay, prioritizing natural justice and the defendant's right to defend the case. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiffs by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case