State of Maharashtra vs Babaso Shivaji Pavane Advocate - V. B. Singhan — 4/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO160000382022
Filing Number
32/2022
Filing Date
07-01-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
07-01-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
243
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Babaso Shivaji Pavane Advocate - V. B. Singhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Babaso Shivaji Pavne, of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving causing injury) due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution presented a case alleging that the accused negligently drove his motorcycle into a pothole on 22 August 2020, injuring the passenger Shobhatai Rajaram Patil, the court found the prosecution's sole witness testimony inconsistent and uncorroborated—the witness initially denied remembering details, later contradicted herself regarding hospitalization dates, and ultimately admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, undermining the case's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Babaso Shivaji Pavne, of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving causing injury) due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution presented a case alleging that the accused negligently drove his motorcycle into a pothole on 22 August 2020, injuring the passenger Shobhatai Rajaram Patil, the court found the prosecution's sole witness testimony inconsistent and uncorroborated—the witness initially denied remembering details, later contradicted herself regarding hospitalization dates, and ultimately admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, undermining the case's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts