THE AJARA URBAN CO OP BANK LTD AJARA vs Swastik Electronics and Mobile proprietor — 613/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150009572025
e-Filing Number
29-11-2025
Filing Number
829/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
613/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station Ajara.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE AJARA URBAN CO OP BANK LTD AJARA
Adv. D. D. Ajagekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swastik Electronics and Mobile proprietor
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 613/2025 Ajara Urban Co-op Bank Ltd v. Swastik Electronics and Mobile The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonoring a cheque. The accused had issued a cheque that was deposited but dishonored; despite receiving legal notice, he failed to repay within the statutory period. Finding prima-facie evidence sufficient, the court proceeded without hearing the accused and permitted service through registered post in addition to regular process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
09-Feb-2026
First Order
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 613/2025
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 613/2025 Ajara Urban Co-op Bank Ltd v. Swastik Electronics and Mobile The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonoring a cheque. The accused had issued a cheque that was deposited but dishonored; despite receiving legal notice, he failed to repay within the statutory period. Finding prima-facie evidence sufficient, the court proceeded without hearing the accused and permitted service through registered post in addition to regular process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts