THE AJARA URBAN CO OP BANK LTD AJARA vs Dinesh Govindrao Padval — 612/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150009562025

e-Filing Number

29-11-2025

Filing Number

828/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

612/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE AJARA URBAN CO OP BANK LTD AJARA

    Adv. D. D. Ajagekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Govindrao Padval

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC 612/2025 - Ajara Urban Co-op Bank Ltd v. Dinesh Govindrao Padval The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The complainant bank deposited a cheque from the accused which was dishonored; despite legal notice and the statutory period to repay, the accused failed to do so. The court found prima-facie evidence sufficient to proceed and permitted service through R.P.A.D. in addition to regular process, allowing the accused to proceed under Section 145(2) upon appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 612/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC 612/2025 - Ajara Urban Co-op Bank Ltd v. Dinesh Govindrao Padval The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The complainant bank deposited a cheque from the accused which was dishonored; despite legal notice and the statutory period to repay, the accused failed to do so. The court found prima-facie evidence sufficient to proceed and permitted service through R.P.A.D. in addition to regular process, allowing the accused to proceed under Section 145(2) upon appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case