Sujata Jotiba Panhalakar vs Shashikant Laxman Palekar — 88/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section Section6(3). Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO150009492025

e-Filing Number

26-11-2025

Filing Number

133/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

88/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section Section6(3)
Specific Relief Act Section 34,38
Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sujata Jotiba Panhalakar

    Adv. L. P. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shashikant Laxman Palekar

  2. 2.Kerba Laxman Palekar

  3. 3.Yashwant Laxman Palekar

  4. 4.Akkatai Laxman Palekar

  5. 5.Suman Laxman Palekar

  6. 6.Laxmibai Laxman Palekar

  7. 7.Geeta alias Malu Pandurang Gurbe

  8. 8.Sangeeta Ananda Torase

  9. 9.Savita Shashikant Palekar

  10. 10.Vimal Shashikant Palekar

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 88/2025 The court rejected the plaintiff's prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction, finding no exceptional or compelling circumstances to justify it. A Show-Cause notice was issued to the defendants requiring them to explain why the injunction should not be granted, with special bailiff and emergent process allowed if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 88/2025 The court rejected the plaintiff's prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction, finding no exceptional or compelling circumstances to justify it. A Show-Cause notice was issued to the defendants requiring them to explain why the injunction should not be granted, with special bailiff and emergent process allowed if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case