Shri Kashinathanna Charati Gramin Bin Sheti Shakari pat Santha Ajara vs Goutam Tukaram Kamble — 512/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Notice_Unready Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150008112025

e-Filing Number

20-09-2025

Filing Number

698/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2025

Registration No

512/2025

Registration Date

22-Sep-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Kashinathanna Charati Gramin Bin Sheti Shakari pat Santha Ajara

    Adv. S. S. Injal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Goutam Tukaram Kamble

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Notice_Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Notice_Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Notice_Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Notice_Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  6. 24-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 512/2025 - Kashinath Charati v. Goutam Tukaram Kamble The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after finding prima-facie sufficient evidence. The complaint alleged the accused issued a cheque that was dishonored, and despite receiving legal notice, failed to repay within the statutory period. The accused is permitted to proceed under Section 145(2) of the Act upon appearance, and the complainant may serve notice through R.P.A.D. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 512/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 512/2025 - Kashinath Charati v. Goutam Tukaram Kamble The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after finding prima-facie sufficient evidence. The complaint alleged the accused issued a cheque that was dishonored, and despite receiving legal notice, failed to repay within the statutory period. The accused is permitted to proceed under Section 145(2) of the Act upon appearance, and the complainant may serve notice through R.P.A.D. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case