State of Maharashtra Through Ajara Police Station vs Mhankali Appa Chougale Advocate - L. P. Patil — 100/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 28-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150006242024

e-Filing Number

01-10-2024

Filing Number

522/2024

Filing Date

24-Oct-2024

Registration No

100/2024

Registration Date

24-Oct-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara Police Station

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mhankali Appa Chougale Advocate - L. P. Patil

Case History

  1. 28-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  3. 14-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    This document records the deposition of Dr. Chetan J. Shikhare (PW-3) for the State on 02.03.2026 in RCC No. 100/2024. Dr. Shikhare, a medical officer at Rural Hospital Ajara, testified that he examined patient Dashrath Appa Chougule on 03.05.2023 for a sharp instrument injury to the left knee (4x1x1 cm lacerated wound) and issued a medical certificate. During cross-examination by the accused's advocate, it was established that the injury could have been caused while cutting a tree, and the doctor acknowledged not receiving the X-ray examination report he had referred for. The court certified that the witness's evidence was recorded via video conferencing with uninterrupted audio and video transmission, and the accused was present and given opportunity to cross-examine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  15. 21-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  18. 22-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  21. 27-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  22. 29-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  23. 24-Oct-2024

    ChargeView PDF

  24. 24-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 24-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the deposition of Dr. Chetan J. Shikhare (PW-3) for the State on 02.03.2026 in RCC No. 100/2024. Dr. Shikhare, a medical officer at Rural Hospital Ajara, testified that he examined patient Dashrath Appa Chougule on 03.05.2023 for a sharp instrument injury to the left knee (4x1x1 cm lacerated wound) and issued a medical certificate. During cross-examination by the accused's advocate, it was established that the injury could have been caused while cutting a tree, and the doctor acknowledged not receiving the X-ray examination report he had referred for. The court certified that the witness's evidence was recorded via video conferencing with uninterrupted audio and video transmission, and the accused was present and given opportunity to cross-examine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case