State of Maharashtra vs Rohit Maruti Mulik Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 69/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304A,279,337,338,427. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150005342019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
408/2019
Filing Date
02-12-2019
Registration No
69/2023
Registration Date
02-12-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
Police Station Ajara.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Rohit Maruti Mulik Advocate - R. I. Palkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rohit Maruti Mulik Advocate & R.I. Palkar (Case 69/2023) This is a criminal case involving a fatal road accident. A retired police sub-inspector testified that he investigated a complaint filed on 06/08/2019 regarding a vehicle accident in which one person died and two others were injured. The witness confirmed recovery of accident scene evidence (damaged motorcycles and car), panchnama (inquest report), and witness statements documenting the accused's rash and negligent driving caused the fatality. The defense counsel cross-examined the investigator regarding procedural details and investigation methodology, raising questions about the investigation's completeness. The court accepted the testimony in full on 17.05.2025, finding no cross-examination rebuttals proved credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rohit Maruti Mulik Advocate & R.I. Palkar (Case 69/2023) This is a criminal case involving a fatal road accident. A retired police sub-inspector testified that he investigated a complaint filed on 06/08/2019 regarding a vehicle accident in which one person died and two others were injured. The witness confirmed recovery of accident scene evidence (damaged motorcycles and car), panchnama (inquest report), and witness statements documenting the accused's rash and negligent driving caused the fatality. The defense counsel cross-examined the investigator regarding procedural details and investigation methodology, raising questions about the investigation's completeness. The court accepted the testimony in full on 17.05.2025, finding no cross-examination rebuttals proved credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts