Shankar Vishnu Savratkar vs Dhondiba Govind Sutar Advocate - S. M. Deshpande — 99/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO150004602016

Evidence

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

99/2016

Filing Date

29-11-2016

Registration No

99/2016

Registration Date

01-12-2016

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2
IA/1/2023 Classification : Amendment of the pleadings Section Shankar Vishnu SavratkarDhondiba Govind Sutar

Petitioner(s)

Shankar Vishnu Savratkar

Adv. S. R. Powar

Respondent(s)

Dhondiba Govind Sutar Advocate - S. M. Deshpande

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

02-05-2026

Evidence

21-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Additional Issues

15-01-2026

Compliance

Interim Orders

17-12-2021
Order on T.I.
11-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In this civil suit for perpetual injunction (R.C.S. No.99/2016, Shankar Vs. Dhondiba & Ors.), the court allowed defendant no.6's application to file a Written Statement (W.S.) beyond the stipulated time, subject to payment of Rs. 500/- cost to Legal Aid, Ajara. The court accepted the defendant's explanation regarding delay caused by his mother's illness and medical treatment, noting that no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff and that valuable property rights were at stake. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this civil suit for perpetual injunction (R.C.S. No.99/2016, Shankar Vs. Dhondiba & Ors.), the court allowed defendant no.6's application to file a Written Statement (W.S.) beyond the stipulated time, subject to payment of Rs. 500/- cost to Legal Aid, Ajara. The court accepted the defendant's explanation regarding delay caused by his mother's illness and medical treatment, noting that no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff and that valuable property rights were at stake. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case