Suresh Shankar Karambali vs Subhash Shankar Karambali Advocate - S. R. Powar — 53/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150004512025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
65/2025
Filing Date
29-04-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
24-06-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Shankar Karambali
Adv. S. A. Salavi
Respondent(s)
Subhash Shankar Karambali Advocate - S. R. Powar
Suresh Vishwanath Kurunkar
Chandrakant Shankarrao Nakate
Haripriya Chandrakant Nakate
Arun Virbhadra Sakhare
Shila Shrikant Aavalakki
Vijaya Ashok Pattanshetti
Shrikant Shankarrao Nakate
Sunita Shashikant Kundargi
Shailashri Mahesh Prasadi
Shravani Mahesh Prasadi
Vijaya Amarnath Shetti
Surekha Prakash Hiddugi
Ranjit Rajaram Dhure
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 17-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 27-01-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this partition and separate possession suit, the court allowed the applications filed by defendants no.5 and no.7, who claimed they lacked legal knowledge and were unable to file their written statement within the stipulated time. The court accepted their written statements on record (marked as Exhibits 56 & 57) with no costs imposed, finding no prejudice to the plaintiff and noting that no adverse order had actually been passed against these defendants previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this partition and separate possession suit, the court allowed the applications filed by defendants no.5 and no.7, who claimed they lacked legal knowledge and were unable to file their written statement within the stipulated time. The court accepted their written statements on record (marked as Exhibits 56 & 57) with no costs imposed, finding no prejudice to the plaintiff and noting that no adverse order had actually been passed against these defendants previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts