Suresh Shankar Karambali vs Subhash Shankar Karambali Advocate - S. R. Powar — 53/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO150004512025

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2025

Filing Number

65/2025

Filing Date

29-04-2025

Registration No

53/2025

Registration Date

24-06-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Acts & Sections

HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Suresh Shankar Karambali

Adv. S. A. Salavi

Respondent(s)

Subhash Shankar Karambali Advocate - S. R. Powar

Suresh Vishwanath Kurunkar

Chandrakant Shankarrao Nakate

Haripriya Chandrakant Nakate

Arun Virbhadra Sakhare

Shila Shrikant Aavalakki

Vijaya Ashok Pattanshetti

Shrikant Shankarrao Nakate

Sunita Shashikant Kundargi

Shailashri Mahesh Prasadi

Shravani Mahesh Prasadi

Vijaya Amarnath Shetti

Surekha Prakash Hiddugi

Ranjit Rajaram Dhure

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

05-05-2026

Order on Exh

06-04-2026

Order on Exh

10-03-2026

Order on Exh

17-02-2026

Steps

27-01-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

02-01-2026
Issues
06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In this partition and separate possession suit, the court allowed the applications filed by defendants no.5 and no.7, who claimed they lacked legal knowledge and were unable to file their written statement within the stipulated time. The court accepted their written statements on record (marked as Exhibits 56 & 57) with no costs imposed, finding no prejudice to the plaintiff and noting that no adverse order had actually been passed against these defendants previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this partition and separate possession suit, the court allowed the applications filed by defendants no.5 and no.7, who claimed they lacked legal knowledge and were unable to file their written statement within the stipulated time. The court accepted their written statements on record (marked as Exhibits 56 & 57) with no costs imposed, finding no prejudice to the plaintiff and noting that no adverse order had actually been passed against these defendants previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case