State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara vs Amar Laxman Naik Advocate - D. D. Ajagekar — 271/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Steps. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150004032025
e-Filing Number
01-10-2024
Filing Number
347/2025
Filing Date
23-Apr-2025
Registration No
271/2025
Registration Date
23-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
221
Police Station
Police Station Ajara.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amar Laxman Naik Advocate - D. D. Ajagekar
Case History
-
13-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
22-Jan-2026
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Jul-2025
PleaView PDF
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Ajara charged accused Amar Lakshman Nayak under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for possessing 61 bottles of illicit liquor intended for sale on September 21, 2024. The accused was produced before the court, informed of charges, declined government-appointed counsel, and denied guilt. The case has been posted for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-May-2025
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
23-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 271/2025
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Ajara charged accused Amar Lakshman Nayak under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for possessing 61 bottles of illicit liquor intended for sale on September 21, 2024. The accused was produced before the court, informed of charges, declined government-appointed counsel, and denied guilt. The case has been posted for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts