The Ajara Arbun Co. Bank Ltd, Ajara vs Akash Bhimrao Pachapure — 112/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150003462022
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2022
Filing Date
30-08-2022
Registration No
112/2022
Registration Date
30-08-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Ajara Arbun Co. Bank Ltd, Ajara
Adv. D. D. Ajagekar
Respondent(s)
Akash Bhimrao Pachapure
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 02-05-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 29-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 28-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 21-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court petition was partially allowed. The accused's application to examine witnesses (the complainant organization's director Vilas Naik, Kishor Bhusari, and executive officer Prashant Gambhir) was granted to enable him to present his defense. The accused is required to deposit witness fees with the court or reimburse witnesses for their attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court petition was partially allowed. The accused's application to examine witnesses (the complainant organization's director Vilas Naik, Kishor Bhusari, and executive officer Prashant Gambhir) was granted to enable him to present his defense. The accused is required to deposit witness fees with the court or reimburse witnesses for their attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts