Govind Bhau Dongare vs Chandru Govind Dongare Advocate - S. V. Powar — 65/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150003332022
Filing Number
112/2022
Filing Date
24-Aug-2022
Registration No
65/2022
Registration Date
24-Aug-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govind Bhau Dongare
Adv. A. S. Farakate
-
2.Vishvnath Bhau Dongare
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandru Govind Dongare Advocate - S. V. Powar
-
2.Umakant Bhau Dongare
-
3.Ganga Dattatray Chavan
-
4.Sumitra Ananda Dongare
-
5.Avadhut Ananda Dongare
-
6.Sanjivani Rajesh Patil
-
7.Shankar Tatoba Parab
-
8.Maruti Tatoba Parab
-
9.Ramchandra Tatoba Parab
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
09-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
15-Dec-2025
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Sep-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
22-Jul-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
15-Jan-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
23-Oct-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
31-Jul-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary The Civil Court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case of ownership and possession over the disputed property, lacking evidence that it was purchased for the Hindu joint family or partitioned to their father. The registered sale deed showed defendant no. 1 as the owner, which prevailed over witness affidavits. No costs were awarded due to the peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jul-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
17-Jul-2023
Formal Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
12-Jun-2023
Formal Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-May-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
26-Apr-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Apr-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
27-Feb-2023
Written Statement
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Feb-2023
Written Statement
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Jan-2023
Written Statement
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
12-Dec-2022
Written Statement
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
17-Oct-2022
Awaiting Notice
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Sep-2022
Awaiting Notice
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
24-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2022
Summary The Civil Court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case of ownership and possession over the disputed property, lacking evidence that it was purchased for the Hindu joint family or partitioned to their father. The registered sale deed showed defendant no. 1 as the owner, which prevailed over witness affidavits. No costs were awarded due to the peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts