Sonabai Maruti Kamble vs Shrikant Janu Kamble — 1/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151, 152. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
M.A.N.R.J.I. - Misc. Application not requiring Judicial Inquiry
CNR: MHKO150003152022
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
106/2022
Filing Date
02-08-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
02-08-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sonabai Maruti Kamble
Adv. S. N. Fagare
Shalan Bhimrao Kamble
Respondent(s)
Shrikant Janu Kamble
Vithal Janu Kamble(Legal Heir)
Anusaya Nana Kamble
Indubai Antu Kamble
Housabai Bhairu Kamble(Legal Heir)
Nirmala Shrikant Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 09-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 15-12-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sonabai & Ors. v. Shrikant & Ors. (1/2022) The court allowed applications by third-party applicants Prakash and Megha to be joined as necessary parties in a decree amendment proceeding. Prakash, who originally received a 3/32 share in RCS No.1/1991, and Megha, who acquired inheritance rights under the amended Hindu Succession Act 2005, were deemed necessary parties whose absence would prevent finality. The court directed petitioners to add them as non-applicants and permitted necessary amendments to the proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sonabai & Ors. v. Shrikant & Ors. (1/2022) The court allowed applications by third-party applicants Prakash and Megha to be joined as necessary parties in a decree amendment proceeding. Prakash, who originally received a 3/32 share in RCS No.1/1991, and Megha, who acquired inheritance rights under the amended Hindu Succession Act 2005, were deemed necessary parties whose absence would prevent finality. The court directed petitioners to add them as non-applicants and permitted necessary amendments to the proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts