1.Sou.Santabai Vithabai Dattaray Gadhakari,etc.2 vs 1.Pandurang Dattu Dhamnakar,etc.2 Advocate - S. S. Nikam — 1300098/2013
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150002912013
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
1300098/2013
Filing Date
19-08-2013
Registration No
1300098/2013
Registration Date
19-08-2013
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Petitioner(s)
1.Sou.Santabai Vithabai Dattaray Gadhakari,etc.2
Adv. A. S. Farakate
Vijay Dattatraya Gadkari
Adv. A. S. Farakate
Respondent(s)
1.Pandurang Dattu Dhamnakar,etc.2 Advocate - S. S. Nikam
Keraba Dattu Magdum
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1300098/2013 Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED/GRANTED. The court permitted the petitioner Santabai to add the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 2 (Pandurang Dattu Dhamnakar, who died on 08.12.2022) as parties to the suit. Although the application was filed over 2 years late and was technically time-barred, the court exercised discretion under CPC Order 22 Rule 10, finding that the heirs are necessary parties to the case and that justice requires their inclusion. The court directed the petitioner to serve proper notice to the proposed defendants and file an amended plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1300098/2013 Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED/GRANTED. The court permitted the petitioner Santabai to add the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 2 (Pandurang Dattu Dhamnakar, who died on 08.12.2022) as parties to the suit. Although the application was filed over 2 years late and was technically time-barred, the court exercised discretion under CPC Order 22 Rule 10, finding that the heirs are necessary parties to the case and that justice requires their inclusion. The court directed the petitioner to serve proper notice to the proposed defendants and file an amended plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts