State of Maharashtra vs Vilas Satyappa More, etc.2 Advocate - S. R. Powar — 19/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 403,406,408,420,465,468,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150002562022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
168/2022
Filing Date
28-06-2022
Registration No
19/2022
Registration Date
28-06-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Police Station Ajara.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Vilas Satyappa More, etc.2 Advocate - S. R. Powar
BalKrushana Dadu Karade
Adv. S. R. Powar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCC 19/2022 The accused's application to defer examination of bank witness Sunil Panhalkar was rejected. The court permitted the prosecution to examine the witness as the opening witness before examining the informant and other witnesses, finding no prejudice to the accused since the witness is independent and will testify only regarding bank documents already on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCC 19/2022 The accused's application to defer examination of bank witness Sunil Panhalkar was rejected. The court permitted the prosecution to examine the witness as the opening witness before examining the informant and other witnesses, finding no prejudice to the accused since the witness is independent and will testify only regarding bank documents already on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts