Shamrao Krushna Jadhav vs Vishnu Nana Jadhav Advocate - R. R. Chavan — 1300069/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 3912. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150002492014
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1300069/2014
Filing Date
21-07-2014
Registration No
1300069/2014
Registration Date
21-07-2014
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shamrao Krushna Jadhav
Adv. G. J. Patil
Respondent(s)
Vishnu Nana Jadhav Advocate - R. R. Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. 1300069/2014 This property dispute involves adjacent land plots (Survey Nos. 675 and 676) between petitioner Shamrao Krushna Jadhav and respondent Vishnu Nana Jadhav. The petitioner alleged that the respondent constructed a boundary wall on the respondent's portion that encroached 36 sq. meters into the petitioner's land and excavated the foundation in a manner threatening the wall's stability. The court found the petitioner's testimony inconsistent and unreliable regarding the alleged encroachment and trespassing claims. The petition was dismissed on April 13, 2026, with costs awarded against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. 1300069/2014 This property dispute involves adjacent land plots (Survey Nos. 675 and 676) between petitioner Shamrao Krushna Jadhav and respondent Vishnu Nana Jadhav. The petitioner alleged that the respondent constructed a boundary wall on the respondent's portion that encroached 36 sq. meters into the petitioner's land and excavated the foundation in a manner threatening the wall's stability. The court found the petitioner's testimony inconsistent and unreliable regarding the alleged encroachment and trespassing claims. The petition was dismissed on April 13, 2026, with costs awarded against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts