Subhadra Suresh Goilkar vs Babasab Bacharam Desai Advocate - S. R. Powar — 1300088/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150002482013
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1300088/2013
Filing Date
15-07-2013
Registration No
1300088/2013
Registration Date
16-07-2013
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhadra Suresh Goilkar
Adv. A. S. Farakate
Smt. Anusaya Shankar Desai
Adv. A. S. Farakate
Respondent(s)
Babasab Bacharam Desai Advocate - S. R. Powar
Shivaji Ganpati Desai(Legal Heir)
Adv. S. R. Powar
Narayan Annappa Mayekar(Legal Heir)
Adv. U. G. Parulekar
Maruti Annappa Mayekar
Adv. U. G. Parulekar
Bhimrao Annappa Mayekar
Adv. U. G. Parulekar
Pramod Mahadev Mayekar
Manija Mahadev Mayekar
Asmita Mahadev Mayekar
Surekha Mahadev Mayekar
Shankar Laxman Temkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a cross-examination record from a property/land dispute case (Civil Suit No. 88/2013) heard before a District Court in Maharashtra, dated March 10, 2026. The court examined witnesses regarding claims about land ownership, agricultural rights (sugarcane cultivation), and disputed property boundaries between parties named Temkar and Mayekar. The order concludes that cross-examination is complete with no further examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a cross-examination record from a property/land dispute case (Civil Suit No. 88/2013) heard before a District Court in Maharashtra, dated March 10, 2026. The court examined witnesses regarding claims about land ownership, agricultural rights (sugarcane cultivation), and disputed property boundaries between parties named Temkar and Mayekar. The order concludes that cross-examination is complete with no further examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts