Anantrao Bhauso Dhure vs Narmada Aappa Buva - Gosavi Advocate - A. M. Sawant — 7/2019

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th August 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO150001732019

Evidence

Next Hearing

17th August 2026

Filing Number

51/2019

Filing Date

08-04-2019

Registration No

7/2019

Registration Date

08-04-2019

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Anantrao Bhauso Dhure

Adv. R. I. Palkar

Respondent(s)

Narmada Aappa Buva - Gosavi Advocate - A. M. Sawant

Shevanta Anandgiri Buva- Gosavi

Anand Balgiri Buva - Gosavi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

04-05-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

02-02-2026

Evidence

22-12-2025

Evidence

10-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

13-10-2025
Evidence

Case Summary: 7/2019 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED with no relief granted. The court found that petitioner Anantrao Bhauso Dhure filed this petition alleging wrongful withdrawal of a power of attorney (POA) document by his relatives, but the evidence presented did not substantiate the claims. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony regarding when his relatives were present in court and the circumstances of the POA filing. The court concluded that the petition lacked merit and dismissed it entirely, finding no grounds for the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 7/2019 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED with no relief granted. The court found that petitioner Anantrao Bhauso Dhure filed this petition alleging wrongful withdrawal of a power of attorney (POA) document by his relatives, but the evidence presented did not substantiate the claims. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony regarding when his relatives were present in court and the circumstances of the POA filing. The court concluded that the petition lacked merit and dismissed it entirely, finding no grounds for the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case