Vishwas Laxman Kodak vs Vasant Laxman Kodak Advocate - B. S. Desai — 21/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150001722020
Next Hearing
06th August 2026
Filing Number
30/2020
Filing Date
18-03-2020
Registration No
21/2020
Registration Date
18-03-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishwas Laxman Kodak
Adv. D. D. Ajegekar
Respondent(s)
Vasant Laxman Kodak Advocate - B. S. Desai
Sushila Vasant Kodak
Uday Vasant Kodak
Sangita Uday Kodak
Shamal Sanjay Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 21/2020: Vishwas Laxman Kodak v. Vasant Laxman Kodak & Others Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application to bring the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 1 (who died on 07.12.2023) on record as necessary parties to the pending suit. The court set aside the abatement order against Respondent No. 1 and directed the petitioner to file an amended plaint substituting the heirs of the deceased respondent. The five-month delay in bringing the heirs on record was condoned, as it was found justified considering the petitioner's geographical distance and difficulty in obtaining necessary documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 21/2020: Vishwas Laxman Kodak v. Vasant Laxman Kodak & Others Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application to bring the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 1 (who died on 07.12.2023) on record as necessary parties to the pending suit. The court set aside the abatement order against Respondent No. 1 and directed the petitioner to file an amended plaint substituting the heirs of the deceased respondent. The five-month delay in bringing the heirs on record was condoned, as it was found justified considering the petitioner's geographical distance and difficulty in obtaining necessary documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts