Bastyav Ghabru Dias vs Namdev Subarao Patil Advocate - S. R. Powar — 104/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150001702025
e-Filing Number
02-03-2025
Filing Number
144/2025
Filing Date
03-Mar-2025
Registration No
104/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bastyav Ghabru Dias
Adv. Devdas Ajagekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Namdev Subarao Patil Advocate - S. R. Powar
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Jan-2026
PleaView PDF
Summary The accused Namdev Subrao Patil was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 50,000 dated 25.01.2024 and failing to pay within 15 days of statutory notice. The accused pleaded not guilty and raised a defense claiming he did not issue or sign the disputed cheque and there is no legally enforceable debt. The case was recorded for trial on 20.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Dec-2025
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
06-Nov-2025
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
07-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
25-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
29-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2025
Summary The accused Namdev Subrao Patil was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 50,000 dated 25.01.2024 and failing to pay within 15 days of statutory notice. The accused pleaded not guilty and raised a defense claiming he did not issue or sign the disputed cheque and there is no legally enforceable debt. The case was recorded for trial on 20.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts