Ashok Krushna Patil vs Laxmi Sah Dudh Sanstha Ltd Kine Tal Ajara Advocate - S. V. Powar — 1300060/2011
Status: Report. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150001652011
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
1300060/2011
Filing Date
25-08-2011
Registration No
1300060/2011
Registration Date
25-08-2011
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Krushna Patil
Adv. S. R. Powar
Subhash Krushna Patil
Laxmibai Krushna Patil
Shakuntal Gangaram Mande
Bayabai Babu Nikam
Vatsala or Arti Sambhaji Nikam
Respondent(s)
Laxmi Sah Dudh Sanstha Ltd Kine Tal Ajara Advocate - S. V. Powar
Babu Krushan Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Report |
| 06-04-2026 | Report |
| 16-03-2026 | Report |
| 23-02-2026 | Report |
| 22-01-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1300060/2011 Ashok Krushna Patil and others v. Laxmi Sah Dudh Sanstha Ltd and others The court allowed the petitioner's petition and set aside the previous survey report (Case No. 115) due to inconsistencies and incomplete measurements. The court ordered a fresh re-survey of Plot No. 40 in Kine village by the Sub-Registrar to accurately determine the boundaries, area occupied by both parties, encroachments, and structures, with a detailed map to be submitted within one month. The petitioner's claims regarding discrepancies in the earlier survey findings were found valid, warranting the re-measurement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1300060/2011 Ashok Krushna Patil and others v. Laxmi Sah Dudh Sanstha Ltd and others The court allowed the petitioner's petition and set aside the previous survey report (Case No. 115) due to inconsistencies and incomplete measurements. The court ordered a fresh re-survey of Plot No. 40 in Kine village by the Sub-Registrar to accurately determine the boundaries, area occupied by both parties, encroachments, and structures, with a detailed map to be submitted within one month. The petitioner's claims regarding discrepancies in the earlier survey findings were found valid, warranting the re-measurement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts