Milind Suresh Sovni vs Radhika Ramkrushan Gadgil Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 33/2022

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO150001642022

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

49/2022

Filing Date

11-04-2022

Registration No

33/2022

Registration Date

11-04-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Milind Suresh Sovni

Adv. S. S. Injal

Respondent(s)

Radhika Ramkrushan Gadgil Advocate - R. I. Palkar

Yogini Dagdu Patil

Mugdha Jayant Kulkarni

Uttam Ramchandra Chougule

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

30-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Issues

02-02-2026

Issues

08-12-2025

Issues

06-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

20-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS 33/2022 - Milind vs. Radhika & Ors. Defendant No. 3's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed on 17.10.2022 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate cited medical reasons for non-appearance, she failed to provide supporting documentation. However, recognizing the suit involves valuable property rights in a pre-emption case and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court permitted the defendant to file her written statement. The parties were directed to proceed with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 33/2022 - Milind vs. Radhika & Ors. Defendant No. 3's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed on 17.10.2022 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate cited medical reasons for non-appearance, she failed to provide supporting documentation. However, recognizing the suit involves valuable property rights in a pre-emption case and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court permitted the defendant to file her written statement. The parties were directed to proceed with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case