Milind Suresh Sovni vs Radhika Ramkrushan Gadgil Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 33/2022
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150001642022
Filing Number
49/2022
Filing Date
11-Apr-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
11-Apr-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Milind Suresh Sovni
Adv. S. S. Injal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Radhika Ramkrushan Gadgil Advocate - R. I. Palkar
-
2.Yogini Dagdu Patil
-
3.Mugdha Jayant Kulkarni
-
4.Uttam Ramchandra Chougule
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Mar-2026
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Feb-2026
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
08-Dec-2025
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
06-Oct-2025
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
25-Aug-2025
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Jun-2025
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
24-Mar-2025
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
24-Feb-2025
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 33/2022 - Milind vs. Radhika & Ors. Defendant No. 3's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed on 17.10.2022 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate cited medical reasons for non-appearance, she failed to provide supporting documentation. However, recognizing the suit involves valuable property rights in a pre-emption case and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court permitted the defendant to file her written statement. The parties were directed to proceed with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2025
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
18-Nov-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
29-Jul-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
06-May-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-Mar-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
01-Jan-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Oct-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
31-Jul-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
12-Jun-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Mar-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Feb-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
09-Jan-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
21-Nov-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
17-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
05-Sep-2022
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
25-Jul-2022
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
13-Jun-2022
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
28-Apr-2022
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
11-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2022
Case Summary: RCS 33/2022 - Milind vs. Radhika & Ors. Defendant No. 3's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed on 17.10.2022 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate cited medical reasons for non-appearance, she failed to provide supporting documentation. However, recognizing the suit involves valuable property rights in a pre-emption case and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court permitted the defendant to file her written statement. The parties were directed to proceed with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts