Milind Suresh Sovni vs Radhika Ramkrushan Gadgil Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 33/2022
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150001642022
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
49/2022
Filing Date
11-04-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
11-04-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Milind Suresh Sovni
Adv. S. S. Injal
Respondent(s)
Radhika Ramkrushan Gadgil Advocate - R. I. Palkar
Yogini Dagdu Patil
Mugdha Jayant Kulkarni
Uttam Ramchandra Chougule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Evidence
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Issues |
| 02-02-2026 | Issues |
| 08-12-2025 | Issues |
| 06-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 33/2022 - Milind vs. Radhika & Ors. Defendant No. 3's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed on 17.10.2022 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate cited medical reasons for non-appearance, she failed to provide supporting documentation. However, recognizing the suit involves valuable property rights in a pre-emption case and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court permitted the defendant to file her written statement. The parties were directed to proceed with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 33/2022 - Milind vs. Radhika & Ors. Defendant No. 3's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed on 17.10.2022 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate cited medical reasons for non-appearance, she failed to provide supporting documentation. However, recognizing the suit involves valuable property rights in a pre-emption case and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court permitted the defendant to file her written statement. The parties were directed to proceed with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts