Jayjayram Daji Patil vs Kamalabai Krishna Patil Advocate - S. R. Powar — 1300034/2011
Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150001622011
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
1300034/2011
Filing Date
08-04-2011
Registration No
1300034/2011
Registration Date
08-04-2011
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Petitioner(s)
Jayjayram Daji Patil
Adv. S. S. Injal
Respondent(s)
Kamalabai Krishna Patil Advocate - S. R. Powar
Yashwant Krisha Patil
Chandrakant Krishna Patil
Ravindra Krishna Patil
Smt.Shakuntala Hari Patil
Anil Hari Patil
Anita Shivaji Ghevade
Sunita Ananda Toraskar
Vanita Digambar Sawant
Rama Daji Patil
Janabai Mahadev Sawant(Legal Heir)
Muktabai Bhaurao Patil(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1300034/2011 This case involved testimony regarding a land sale deed (खरेडीपत्र) executed on 26.03.2008 for 2.3 acres in Gat No. 330. The witness testified about the preparation and execution of the sale document, the parties involved (Jayjayram Patil as buyer and Rama Patil as seller), and the witnesses to the transaction. The court examined the legality of the deed's execution, the authenticity of signatures, and compliance with revenue department requirements. The judgment, dated 13.01.2026, dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the document's validity, finding no evidence of forgery or irregularity in the deed's preparation and execution by the scribe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1300034/2011 This case involved testimony regarding a land sale deed (खरेडीपत्र) executed on 26.03.2008 for 2.3 acres in Gat No. 330. The witness testified about the preparation and execution of the sale document, the parties involved (Jayjayram Patil as buyer and Rama Patil as seller), and the witnesses to the transaction. The court examined the legality of the deed's execution, the authenticity of signatures, and compliance with revenue department requirements. The judgment, dated 13.01.2026, dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the document's validity, finding no evidence of forgery or irregularity in the deed's preparation and execution by the scribe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts