Ranjeet Bacharam Yelkar vs Hrishikesh Vishwas Kamble — 107/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150001502026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
138/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
107/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ranjeet Bacharam Yelkar
Adv. S. S. Injal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hrishikesh Vishwas Kamble
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 107/2026 Summary: The court issued process against the accused Hrishikesh Vishwas Kamble under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. Petitioner Ranjeet Bacharam Yelkar's complaint was found to have prima-facie sufficient evidence after the accused failed to repay the cheque amount within the statutory period despite receiving legal notice. The accused may proceed under Section 145(2) of the NI Act upon appearance, and the complainant is permitted to serve notice through registered post and other permissible modes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 107/2026
Case 107/2026 Summary: The court issued process against the accused Hrishikesh Vishwas Kamble under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. Petitioner Ranjeet Bacharam Yelkar's complaint was found to have prima-facie sufficient evidence after the accused failed to repay the cheque amount within the statutory period despite receiving legal notice. The accused may proceed under Section 145(2) of the NI Act upon appearance, and the complainant is permitted to serve notice through registered post and other permissible modes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts