State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara vs Habeel Nilu Naik — 105/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150001482026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

136/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Habeel Nilu Naik

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara convicted accused Habil Nilu Nayak under Sections 185 and 50/177 of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol without a number plate on 01.01.2026. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his financial hardship as a laborer and lack of prior criminal record, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,500 with 5 days simple imprisonment in default, adopting a lenient approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara convicted accused Habil Nilu Nayak under Sections 185 and 50/177 of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol without a number plate on 01.01.2026. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his financial hardship as a laborer and lack of prior criminal record, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,500 with 5 days simple imprisonment in default, adopting a lenient approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case