State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara vs Babasaheb Badesaheb Sanadee — 104/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,130(1),177. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150001472026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

104/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

316

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,130(1),177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babasaheb Badesaheb Sanadee

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court convicted Babasaheb Badesaheb Sanadi under Sections 185, 130(1), and 177 of the Motor Vehicle Act after he pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol without a valid license. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000 (with 5 days simple imprisonment as default) while considering his poor financial condition, lack of prior offenses, and voluntary guilty plea to impose a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 08-May-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Babasaheb Badesaheb Sanadi under Sections 185, 130(1), and 177 of the Motor Vehicle Act after he pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol without a valid license. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000 (with 5 days simple imprisonment as default) while considering his poor financial condition, lack of prior offenses, and voluntary guilty plea to impose a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case