State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara vs Ravindra Baburao Patil — 102/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150001452026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

334

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ravindra Baburao Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court convicted Ravindra Baburao Patil under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 31.12.2025. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine (with 3 days simple imprisonment in default) considering his voluntary plea, clean record, and financial hardship, rather than the maximum penalty prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Ravindra Baburao Patil under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 31.12.2025. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine (with 3 days simple imprisonment in default) considering his voluntary plea, clean record, and financial hardship, rather than the maximum penalty prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case