State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara vs Hasham Imam Nalband — 97/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150001402026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

97/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

301

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara police Station Ajara

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hasham Imam Nalband

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara, convicted Hasham Imam Nalband under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 11.12.2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 3,000 fine (with 3 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of the maximum prescribed penalty, considering his clean antecedents, financial hardship, and guilty plea that saved court time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    First Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara, convicted Hasham Imam Nalband under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 11.12.2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 3,000 fine (with 3 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of the maximum prescribed penalty, considering his clean antecedents, financial hardship, and guilty plea that saved court time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case