Krushna Anil Mhapsekar vs State of Maharashtra Through ps Inspector State Excise Gadhinglaj Advocate - A. P. P. — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO150001252026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
114/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Decision Date
11th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
Police Station Ajara.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krushna Anil Mhapsekar
Adv. CHAVAN PARSHURAM BABURAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through ps (Police Station) Inspector State Excise Gadhinglaj Advocate - A. P. P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Disposed
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 09-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 06-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 13/2026 The court granted interim custody of a seized Maruti Alto vehicle (MH-07-H-581) to petitioner Krushna Anil Mhapsekar, who claimed ownership. The vehicle was seized in an excise violation case (FIR 182/2024) involving alleged illegal liquor transportation. The court found that the accused was deceased, the case was abated, and the petitioner established ownership through documented evidence and first-possession rights. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sundarbhai Desai v. Gujarat), the court granted interim custody subject to conditions including production of the vehicle within 30 days and a guarantee bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 13/2026 The court granted interim custody of a seized Maruti Alto vehicle (MH-07-H-581) to petitioner Krushna Anil Mhapsekar, who claimed ownership. The vehicle was seized in an excise violation case (FIR 182/2024) involving alleged illegal liquor transportation. The court found that the accused was deceased, the case was abated, and the petitioner established ownership through documented evidence and first-possession rights. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sundarbhai Desai v. Gujarat), the court granted interim custody subject to conditions including production of the vehicle within 30 days and a guarantee bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts