Krushna Anil Mhapsekar vs State of Maharashtra Through ps Inspector State Excise Gadhinglaj Advocate - A. P. P. — 13/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO150001252026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Decision Date

11th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

Police Station Ajara.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498

Petitioner(s)

Krushna Anil Mhapsekar

Adv. CHAVAN PARSHURAM BABURAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through ps (Police Station) Inspector State Excise Gadhinglaj Advocate - A. P. P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

11-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Notice_Unready

09-04-2026

Notice_Unready

06-04-2026

Notice_Unready

16-03-2026

Notice_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

11-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 13/2026 The court granted interim custody of a seized Maruti Alto vehicle (MH-07-H-581) to petitioner Krushna Anil Mhapsekar, who claimed ownership. The vehicle was seized in an excise violation case (FIR 182/2024) involving alleged illegal liquor transportation. The court found that the accused was deceased, the case was abated, and the petitioner established ownership through documented evidence and first-possession rights. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sundarbhai Desai v. Gujarat), the court granted interim custody subject to conditions including production of the vehicle within 30 days and a guarantee bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 13/2026 The court granted interim custody of a seized Maruti Alto vehicle (MH-07-H-581) to petitioner Krushna Anil Mhapsekar, who claimed ownership. The vehicle was seized in an excise violation case (FIR 182/2024) involving alleged illegal liquor transportation. The court found that the accused was deceased, the case was abated, and the petitioner established ownership through documented evidence and first-possession rights. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sundarbhai Desai v. Gujarat), the court granted interim custody subject to conditions including production of the vehicle within 30 days and a guarantee bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case