State of Maharashtra Through Ajara Police Station vs Ajit Mahadev Parit — 85/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 128(1)194(C)130(1)177. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO150001222026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

85/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 128(1)194(C)130(1)177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Ajara Police Station

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajit Mahadev Parit

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara convicted Ajit Mahadev Parit under Section 128(1) read with 194(c) of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving a vehicle with triple seating on a public road on 31.12.2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and considering his lack of previous antecedents, financial constraints, and willingness to settle the case, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine (or 1 day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara convicted Ajit Mahadev Parit under Section 128(1) read with 194(c) of the Motor Vehicle Act for driving a vehicle with triple seating on a public road on 31.12.2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and considering his lack of previous antecedents, financial constraints, and willingness to settle the case, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine (or 1 day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case