Ram Sahakari Gruhataran Sanstha Ltd Peranoli vs Dhiraj Vishnu Yedurkar — 48/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150000762026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ram Sahakari Gruhataran Sanstha Ltd Peranoli
Adv. RAMESH SHAMRAO CHAVAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhiraj Vishnu Yedurkar
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
05-Jun-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
11-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 48/2026 The court issued process against accused Dhiraj Vishnu Yedurkar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. The complainant Ram Sahakari Gruhataran Sanstha Ltd deposited a cheque from the accused that was dishonored; despite legal notice, the accused failed to repay within the statutory period. The court found prima-facie sufficient allegations and evidence to proceed, and permitted service of notice through registered post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2026
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 48/2026 The court issued process against accused Dhiraj Vishnu Yedurkar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. The complainant Ram Sahakari Gruhataran Sanstha Ltd deposited a cheque from the accused that was dishonored; despite legal notice, the accused failed to repay within the statutory period. The court found prima-facie sufficient allegations and evidence to proceed, and permitted service of notice through registered post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts