Baban Krushna Powar vs Pandurang Dattu Powar Advocate - S. R. Powar — 17/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150000732021
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
22/2021
Filing Date
05-02-2021
Registration No
17/2021
Registration Date
05-02-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baban Krushna Powar
Adv. S. S. Injal
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Dattu Powar Advocate - S. R. Powar
Shivaji Dattu Powar
Latabai Basappa Parle
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 05-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court completed the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness and proceeded with cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The court rejected the defendant's request to dispense with cross-examination due to the defendant's appointed advocate's failure to file a vakalatnama (power of attorney), ordering that cross-examination shall proceed as per standard procedure. The order was dated 10.12.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court completed the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness and proceeded with cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The court rejected the defendant's request to dispense with cross-examination due to the defendant's appointed advocate's failure to file a vakalatnama (power of attorney), ordering that cross-examination shall proceed as per standard procedure. The order was dated 10.12.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts