Saurabh Shravan Kamble vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Ajara Advocate - A. P. P. — 7/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO150000512026
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
22-01-2026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saurabh Shravan Kamble
Adv. ASHLESH DEVDAS AJAGEKAR
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Ajara Advocate - A. P. P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 01-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 22-05-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 15-05-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 07-05-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - Cri. M. A. No. 7/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ajara adjourned the case and directed both the applicant (Saurabh Shravan Kamble) and the Investigating Officer to produce bank details showing where the amount allegedly deposited following a fraud complaint is held. The court noted that the applicant had not provided these bank details and the I.O. had not filed the corresponding bank letter. The matter was left pending for compliance with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - Cri. M. A. No. 7/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ajara adjourned the case and directed both the applicant (Saurabh Shravan Kamble) and the Investigating Officer to produce bank details showing where the amount allegedly deposited following a fraud complaint is held. The court noted that the applicant had not provided these bank details and the I.O. had not filed the corresponding bank letter. The matter was left pending for compliance with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts