Smt.Tulsabai Pandu Konduskar vs Vishnu Masu Katkar,etc.10 Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 4/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section C. P. C. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150000302020
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
4/2020
Filing Date
14-01-2020
Registration No
4/2020
Registration Date
14-01-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Tulsabai Pandu Konduskar
Adv. D. J. Desai
Respondent(s)
Vishnu Masu Katkar,etc.10 Advocate - R. I. Palkar
Dayanand Ishavar Katkar
Sangita Dilip Survavshi
Sarita Jothiba Bhogn
Asamita Shankar Chavan
Parvin Kerba Katkar
Manisha Namadev Belwadkar
Sunil Kerba Katkar
Sushila Kerba Katkar
Hoshabai Shivaji Kandgla
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Steps
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Summons
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 01-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 4/2020 - Tulsabai v. Vishnu Masu Katkar & Others The plaintiff's application to amend the suit for partition and possession by adding Block No. 577 (ancestral land in defendant no. 1's name) was ALLOWED with conditions. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 payable to Legal Aid, Ajara, finding that while all family properties must be included in partition suits, the plaintiff caused delay by omitting the property inadvertently. The plaintiff must file an amended plaint within the prescribed timeframe, and defendants may file an amended written statement responding only to the amended portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 4/2020 - Tulsabai v. Vishnu Masu Katkar & Others The plaintiff's application to amend the suit for partition and possession by adding Block No. 577 (ancestral land in defendant no. 1's name) was ALLOWED with conditions. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 payable to Legal Aid, Ajara, finding that while all family properties must be included in partition suits, the plaintiff caused delay by omitting the property inadvertently. The plaintiff must file an amended plaint within the prescribed timeframe, and defendants may file an amended written statement responding only to the amended portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts