State of Maharashtra vs Jotiba alias Appaji Kalgonda Magdum, etc. 2 Advocate - D. J. Desai — 2/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--SOME CONVICTED AND RELEASED ON PROBATION, SOME ACQUITTED on 11th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO150000142023
e-Filing Number
19-12-2022
Filing Number
13/2023
Filing Date
03-Jan-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
03-Jan-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Decision Date
11-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--SOME CONVICTED AND RELEASED ON PROBATION, SOME ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Police Station Ajara.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jotiba alias Appaji Kalgonda Magdum, etc. 2 Advocate - D. J. Desai
-
2.Karveer Jotiba Magdum
Adv. D. J. Desai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the two accused (Jotiba and Karvir) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 with Section 34, but convicted them under Section 324 with Section 34. The court sentenced both accused to one year probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with a bond of ₹15,000 and ordered them to pay ₹5,000 compensation to the victim. The court found the accused guilty of voluntarily causing hurt with a wooden stick but insufficient evidence for charges of wrongful restraint and criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Apr-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgment
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgment
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
07-Nov-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
26-May-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
26-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Jan-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
06-Dec-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Sep-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
22-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
12-May-2023
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
02-Feb-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2023
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the two accused (Jotiba and Karvir) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 with Section 34, but convicted them under Section 324 with Section 34. The court sentenced both accused to one year probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with a bond of ₹15,000 and ordered them to pay ₹5,000 compensation to the victim. The court found the accused guilty of voluntarily causing hurt with a wooden stick but insufficient evidence for charges of wrongful restraint and criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts