Laxmi Balu Chawan vs Krushna Ishwar Shevale Advocate - D. J. Desai — 1/2022
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO150000012022
Filing Number
1/2022
Filing Date
01-Jan-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
01-Jan-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Ajara
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Laxmi Balu Chawan
Adv. D. D. Ajagekar
-
2.Geeta Balu Chawan
-
3.Chandrabhaga Shankar Kamble
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krushna Ishwar Shevale Advocate - D. J. Desai
-
2.Vishnu Ishwar Shevale
-
3.Laxmi Prakash Powar
-
4.Rukmini Ishwar Shevale
-
5.Vaishali Jivan Shevale
-
6.Dashrath Gunaji Holam
-
7.Rajaram Gunaji Holam
-
8.Bhima Dattu Dhadam
-
9.Ratnamala Dashrath Holam
-
10.Prakash Shivaji Gurav
-
11.Pandurang Janaba Khamakar
-
12.Shamrao janaba Khamkar
-
13.Shankar Gundu Khamkar
-
14.Sanjivani Sanjay Dongre
-
15.Jonifer
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Sep-2025
EvidenceView PDF
This is a civil matter regarding partition of ancestral property in Marathi. The court order dated 30.09.2025 from the District Court, Ajara, dismissed the petition. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to the disputed agricultural property and rejected their arguments regarding the division and boundaries of the inherited land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
13-Jun-2025
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
05-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Apr-2025
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
13-Mar-2025
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Jun-2024
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
27-Mar-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
27-Mar-2024
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
14-Feb-2024
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
22-Nov-2023
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
17-Oct-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Aug-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
15-Jun-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-May-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
17-Mar-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
20-Jan-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Jan-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Nov-2022
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
15-Oct-2022
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
08-Sep-2022
Steps_Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
26-Aug-2022
Steps_Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
30-Jul-2022
Steps_Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
24-Jun-2022
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
04-May-2022
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Mar-2022
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
22-Feb-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
22-Feb-2022
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
16-Feb-2022
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
29-Jan-2022
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
19-Jan-2022
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
12-Jan-2022
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
06-Jan-2022
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Ajara
-
03-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2022
This is a civil matter regarding partition of ancestral property in Marathi. The court order dated 30.09.2025 from the District Court, Ajara, dismissed the petition. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to the disputed agricultural property and rejected their arguments regarding the division and boundaries of the inherited land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts