Sidray Bhavakana Sungar vs Shankar Shatyappa Patil Advocate - S. S. Kot — 179/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140012082021
Filing Number
253/2021
Filing Date
22-Dec-2021
Registration No
179/2021
Registration Date
22-Dec-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sidray Bhavakana Sungar
Adv. P. B. Patil
-
2.Malutai Nandkumar Divate
-
3.Sushila Yallappa Gelvagol
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shankar Shatyappa Patil Advocate - S. S. Kot
-
2.Mahadevi Laxman Patil
-
3.Suhasini Pundlik Vhalli
-
4.Shubhangi Kiran Patil
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
16-Mar-2026
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
12-Jan-2026
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
24-Nov-2025
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 179/2021 Outcome: The court allowed the petitioners' application and set aside the order directing respondents 2-4 to file a written reply. The court granted permission for late filing of the written reply, imposed costs of Rs. 600/- against the respondents, and directed costs be paid to the petitioners. Key Points: The respondents had delayed filing their written reply due to difficulty locating respondent 2 (an elderly person) and unavailability of legal representation for respondents 3-4 (who reside in Karnataka and Pune). The court found the delay justified in interests of justice and necessary for proper adjudication of the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Sep-2025
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
31-Jul-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
27-Jun-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
25-Jun-2025
Notice_Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
24-Mar-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
15-Jan-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
15-Nov-2024
Steps_Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
17-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
12-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
07-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Dec-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
29-Sep-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
07-Jul-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
04-May-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
20-Mar-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
19-Jan-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
29-Nov-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
18-Oct-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
20-Sep-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
12-Aug-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
29-Jun-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
05-Apr-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
07-Mar-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-Jan-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
23-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2021
Case Summary: 179/2021 Outcome: The court allowed the petitioners' application and set aside the order directing respondents 2-4 to file a written reply. The court granted permission for late filing of the written reply, imposed costs of Rs. 600/- against the respondents, and directed costs be paid to the petitioners. Key Points: The respondents had delayed filing their written reply due to difficulty locating respondent 2 (an elderly person) and unavailability of legal representation for respondents 3-4 (who reside in Karnataka and Pune). The court found the delay justified in interests of justice and necessary for proper adjudication of the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts