Parsharam Dattu Ardalkar vs Bajirao Dattu Ardalkar Advocate - N. G. Ajarekar — 164/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO140008042023

e-Filing Number

21-12-2023

Filing Number

245/2023

Filing Date

21-Dec-2023

Registration No

164/2023

Registration Date

22-Dec-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parsharam Dattu Ardalkar

    Adv. G. N. Dalvi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bajirao Dattu Ardalkar Advocate - N. G. Ajarekar

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  5. 12-Nov-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  7. 08-Aug-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  8. 18-Jun-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  9. 19-Mar-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  10. 18-Jan-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  11. 10-Dec-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  12. 11-Oct-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  13. 22-Jul-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  14. 29-Apr-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  15. 09-Feb-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  16. 16-Jan-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  17. 12-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The plaintiff's application (Exh.28) seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to inspect the suit property and document the defendant's ongoing construction has been rejected. The Civil Judge held that appointing a commissioner at this stage would not be fruitful, as the plaintiff must first establish the existence of the right of way and the relief sought in the suit does not include removal of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 12-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  19. 11-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  20. 09-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  21. 06-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  22. 04-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  23. 28-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  24. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 21-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application (Exh.28) seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to inspect the suit property and document the defendant's ongoing construction has been rejected. The Civil Judge held that appointing a commissioner at this stage would not be fruitful, as the plaintiff must first establish the existence of the right of way and the relief sought in the suit does not include removal of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case