Parsharam Dattu Ardalkar vs Bajirao Dattu Ardalkar Advocate - N. G. Ajarekar — 164/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140008042023
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-12-2023
Filing Number
245/2023
Filing Date
21-12-2023
Registration No
164/2023
Registration Date
22-12-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parsharam Dattu Ardalkar
Adv. G. N. Dalvi
Respondent(s)
Bajirao Dattu Ardalkar Advocate - N. G. Ajarekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Issues |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues |
| 03-01-2026 | Issues |
| 12-11-2025 | Issues |
| 14-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application (Exh.28) seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to inspect the suit property and document the defendant's ongoing construction has been rejected. The Civil Judge held that appointing a commissioner at this stage would not be fruitful, as the plaintiff must first establish the existence of the right of way and the relief sought in the suit does not include removal of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application (Exh.28) seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to inspect the suit property and document the defendant's ongoing construction has been rejected. The Civil Judge held that appointing a commissioner at this stage would not be fruitful, as the plaintiff must first establish the existence of the right of way and the relief sought in the suit does not include removal of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts